
Weigh up the pros and cons of treatment options
To make a treatment choice that is right for you, it's important to look at your treatment options and compare the pros and cons of each of each of these. Under each of the headings below, explore the pros and cons of each treatment option.
To download a pdf of the information on this page, click the button below.
Treatment cost:
ACL surgery costs more than rehab without surgery. This cost will vary depending on your health insurance. Lower cost ACL surgery is offered in the public system in Australia but usually has long waiting list times of between twelve to eighteen months.

Risk of surgical complications:
ACL surgery comes with a risk of serious and less serious surgical complications. The surgeon’s choice of techniques and devices can affect the outcomes and risks.



.png)









Serious complications (0.7%)
E.g. myocardial infarction (<.01%), stroke (<.01%), pulmonary embolism (0.1%), infection requiring surgery (0.5%), fasciotomy (.02%), neurovascular injury (.02%), death (.01%)
Bleeding complications, post surgery blood loss, blood transfusion, injury to an artery
Deep vein thrombosis: 9.7%, pulmonary embolism: 0.1%, pseudaneurysms: 0.3%
Tibial cyst (3.9%), abscess, cyclops lesion (swelling, pain, tenderness, instability)
Knee joint contracture: restricted movement (2-43%), stiffness (3%) and pain
Infection, allergic and foreign body reactions, poor wound healing: infection rate varies (2-11%) depending on type of screws/staples
Implant breakage, migration and failure
Graft site complications:
patellar fracture (0.4-1.3%), hamstring retraction, reduced strength/size, anterior knee pain (15-81%), kneeling pain (10-57%)
Nerve damage (sensory loss): 40-80% of hamstring grafts
Bone tunnel widening, fracture of bone due to bone drilling, tunnel malpositioning, thermal necrosis
Septic arthritis (0.4-2.1%), chronic inflammation of joint structures, cellulitis
Pain medication and general anaesthetic complications: e.g. nausea, vomiting, sedation, postdural puncture, headache, sweating, dizziness
Graft failure or rupture, surgical revision
(References 75 - 93 at the end of this page)

Avoiding knee surgery
You will have knee surgery under a general anaesthetic and may stay the night in hospital.

Knee stability
A successful outcome from ACL reconstruction surgery will mean that your knee feels stable and you regain full movement once recovered from surgery.
An unsuccessful outcome can include an unstable knee or restricted knee movement.

Length of recovery

The length of rehab is typically twelve to eighteen months after ACL surgery.
Some people may take longer to recover or may not fully recover if they are not happy with the results of the surgery.
Convenience

ACL surgery will result in some time of pain, swelling, poor function and being restricted in what the knee can do. After the surgery, you will need to walk with crutches and will not be able to drive for up to six weeks.
Some people with private health insurance may choose to delay the surgery and book in for surgery at a particular time of year when it is most convenient.
Potential for natural healing of the ACL

The torn ACL is removed during ACL reconstruction surgery, meaning that there’s no chance of the ACL healing in the future.
Muscle strength and function

In a successful surgical outcome, you should regain at least 90% of your thigh muscle strength.
On the other hand, muscle weakness and reduced muscle control can persist beyond twelve months of ACL reconstruction surgery. You may also have pain or weakness where the graft is taken from.
Further knee injury
If you have ACL reconstruction surgery there is a risk of rupturing the ACL graft, which can lead to poor long-term outcomes. Further injuries to other parts of the knee can also occur.

Return to sport

Return to sport is not typically advised until twelve months after ACL reconstruction surgery. 55% of people return to competitive sport after ACL surgery.
Fear of re-injury is the most common reason people don’t return to sport after ACL reconstruction surgery. Your risk of re-injury may be higher if you return to sport while you have reduced knee strength and function.
Satisfaction with knee function
About half of people are satisfied with their knee function two years after ACL surgery, or two years after rehab without surgery.

Knee osteoarthritis (OA)

More knee swelling and cartilage changes occur after ACL reconstruction surgery. ACL surgery may lead to higher rates of knee OA, as seen on x-ray. But it’s important to know, that having a knee x-ray that shows OA doesn’t mean that you’ll have any knee pain and symptoms. Few studies have compared rates of painful OA between treatment groups.
75. Abram, S. G., Judge, A., Beard, D. J., & Price, A. J. (2019). Rates of adverse outcomes and revision surgery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a study of 104,255 procedures using the National Hospital Episode Statistics Database for England, UK. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 47(11), 2533-2542.
76. Janssen, R. P. A., Reijman, M., Janssen, D. M., van Mourik, J. B. A., Janssen, D. M., & van Mourik, J. B. A. (2016). Arterial complications, venous thromboembolism and deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review [Article]. World Journal of Orthopedics, 7(9), 604-617, https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v7.i9.604
77. Bongiovanni, T., Lancaster, E., Ledesma, Y., Whitaker, E., Steinman, M. A., Allen, I. E., Auerbach, A., & Wick, E. (2021). Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Association Between Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs and Operative Bleeding in the Perioperative Period [Review]. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 232(5), 765-790.e761. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2021.01.005
78. Tsai, Y. T., Wu, C. C., Pan, R. Y., & Shen, P. H. (2025). Risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE) following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104184
79. Barbosa, N. C., Campos, J. P., Capelão, V., Kandhari, V., Vieira, T. D., & Sonnery-Cottet, B. (2021). A comprehensive scoping review of tibial cysts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction [Review]. Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, 8(1), Article 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-021-00356-9
80. Jackson, G. R., Mameri, E. S., Tuthill, T., Wessels, M., Asif, S., Sugrañes, J., ... & Chahla, J. (2023). Adverse events and complications after primary ACL reconstruction with quadriceps tendon autograft: a systematic review. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, 11(12), DOI: 10.1177/23259671231199728
81. Wang, B., Zhong, J. L., Xu, X. H., Shang, J., Lin, N., & Lu, H. D. (2020). Incidence and risk factors of joint stiffness after Anterior Cruciate Ligament reconstruction [Meta-Analysis Systematic Review]. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery, 15(1), 175. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01694-7
82. Lameire, D. L., Abdel Khalik, H., Zakharia, A., Kay, J., Almasri, M., & de, S. D. (2021). Bone Grafting the Patellar Defect After Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Decreases Anterior Knee Morbidity: A Systematic Review [Review]. Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, 37(7), 2361-2376.e2361. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2021.03.031
83. Zhao, L., Lu, M., Deng, M., Xing, J., He, L., & Wang, C. (2020). Outcome of bone-patellar tendon-bone vs hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with a 5-year minimum follow-up [Article]. Medicine, 99(48), e23476. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000023476
84. Debieux, P., Franciozi, C. E., Lenza, M., Tamaoki, M. J., Magnussen, R. A., Faloppa, F., & Belloti, J. C. (2016). Bioabsorbable versus metallic interference screws for graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction [Meta-Analysis Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Review Systematic Review]. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 7, CD009772. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009772.pub2
85. Trasolini, N. A., Lan, R., Bolia, I. K., Hill, W., Thompson, A. A., Mayfield, C. K., ... & Weber, A. E. (2023). Knee extensor mechanism complications after autograft harvest in ACL reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, 11(7), DOI: 10.1177/23259671231177665
86. Peebles, L. A., Akamefula, R. A., Aman, Z. S., Verma, A., Scillia, A. J., Mulcahey, M. K., & Kraeutler, M. J. (2024). Following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone–patellar tendon–bone autograft, the incidence of anterior knee pain ranges from 5.4% to 48.4% and the incidence of kneeling pain ranges from 4.0% to 75.6%: A systematic review of level I studies. Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation, 6(2), DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100902
87. Grassi, A., Perdisa, F., Samuelsson, K., Svantesson, E., Romagnoli, M., Raggi, F., Gaziano, T., Mosca, M., Ayeni, O., & Zaffagnini, S. (2018). Association between incision technique for hamstring tendon harvest in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and the risk of injury to the infra-patellar branch of the saphenous nerve: a meta-analysis [Review]. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 26(8), 2410-2423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-4858-x
88. Makhni, E. C., Steinhaus, M. E., Mehran, N., Schulz, B. S., & Ahmad, C. S. (2015). Functional Outcome and Graft Retention in Patients with Septic Arthritis after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review [Review]. Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, 31(7), 1392-1401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2014.12.026
89. Voss, A., Pfeifer, C. G., Kerschbaum, M., Rupp, M., Angele, P., & Alt, V. (2021). Post-operative septic arthritis after arthroscopy: modern diagnostic and therapeutic concepts [Review]. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 29(10), 3149-3158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06525-8
90. Naendrup, J. H., Marche, B., de Sa, D., Koenen, P., Otchwemah, R., Wafaisade, A., & Pfeiffer, T. R. (2020). Vancomycin-soaking of the graft reduces the incidence of septic arthritis following ACL reconstruction: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis [Article]. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 28(4), 1005-1013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05353-1
91. Wang, C., Lee, Y. H., & Siebold, R. (2014). Recommendations for the management of septic arthritis after ACL reconstruction [Review]. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 22(9), 2136-2144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2648-z
92. Maheshwer, B., Knapik, D. M., Polce, E. M., Verma, N. N., LaPrade, R. F., & Chahla, J. (2021). Contribution of multimodal analgesia to postoperative pain outcomes immediately after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of level 1 randomized clinical trials. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 49(11), 3132-3144.
93. Marrache, M., Best, M. J., Raad, M., Mikula, J. D., Amin, R. M., & Wilckens, J. H. (2020). Opioid Prescribing Trends and Geographic Variation After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction [Article]. Sports Health, 12(6), 528-533. https://doi.org/10.1177/1941738120954432












